Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 WIS 627 - Emery v. State

Emery v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
12
states following
February 1983
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently February 1983 · most notably Oborn v. State (1910), In re Neff (1953)

2 federal appellate · 75 state decisions — followed in 12 states

3001899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spies v. People · Farley v. State · Dreher v. Town of Fitchburg · State v. Russell · Shoeffler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may well be said, when the testimony of the wife of one defendant is material and reasonably necessary to the defense of a codefendant, that a severance should be granted on motion of the person seeking to obtain the benefit of such testimony, and that a denial of it is the denial of a right, because a fair exercise of judicial discretion would result in granting it; but in the absence of a clear showing that the evidence of the wife in the circumstances stated is necessary and material to the defense of a codefendant, the motion for a severance may properly be denied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““So that the attorney-general rightly appeared and assisted in the prosecution of this case does not admit' of question. It was not within his discretion to comply or refuse to comply with the governor’s request, or within the discretion of the circuit court to permit or refuse to permit him to participate in the trial.” (p. 646.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is certainly consistent with a just administration of the law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.