Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 W. Va. 711 - Yonker v. Grimm

101 W. Va. 711 - Yonker v. Grimm’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1982

19 state decisions

601926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. . Sinsheimer · State v. Cobbs · Oney v. Clendenin · Low v. Settle · Miller v. Holt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A verdict in a civil case which is defective or erroneous in a mere matter of form, not affecting the merits or the rights of the parties, may be amended by the court to conform it to the issue and give effect to what the jury unmistakably find. . . . This, as may be observed, goes to a matter of mere form. The judge cannot, under the guise of amending the verdict, invade the province of the jury or substitute his verdict for theirs. All the cases in which such amendments have been upheld are where the omission of words which are merely technical have been supplied by the court. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘ ‘ The power of a jury over their verdict, unlike that of the court, ceases on their discharge. With their assent to the verdict as recorded their functions with respect to the case cease and the trial is closed, and after the verdict is received and the jury discharged the control of the jury is at an end, and they’ cannot be recalled to alter or amend it. ” 27 E. C. L. 895.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.