Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Wife (J. F. v. v. Husband (O. W. v. Jr.) · R. T. G. v. G. K. G. · 36 Del. Ch. 457 - Mayer v. Mayer · R. E. T. v. A. L. T.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Family Court’s rulings will not be disturbed on appeal if ... its explanations, deductions and inferences are the product of a logical and deductive reasoning process.”). 35 . Opinion I at 29-30. 36 . Id. at 29. 37 . Id. at 23 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glanden v. Quirk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.