¶1— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), imposed February 20, 1980, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, upon a jury verdict. 11 Resentence affirmed. H We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.
102 A.D.2d 895
People v. Denham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 1984
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1984-06-25
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1991
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-06-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →