Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 ALA 445 - Moore v. Campbell

Moore v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
March 1960
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1960

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

4018931900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brison v. Brison · Matter of Will of O'Hara · Patton v. Beecher · Gilpatrick v. Glidden · Jordan v. Jordan's Adm'r

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The principle that a parol trust may be ingrafted upon a devise or bequest after probate of the will was declared in Bishop’s Heirs v. Bishop’s Adm’r, 13 Ala. 475 , and followed in Barrell v. Hanrick, 42 Ala. 60 . We are not aware that the question has arisen since in this state. The doctrine has found support in other states (citing cases). We do not feel at liberty to depart from the rule, inasmuch as the statute of wills was re-enacted in the same language after the rendition of these decisions, and it is not necessary to the decision in this case; but there are so many objections to its application to wills, we feel justified in pointing out some of them, that the legislative department may make statutory provision in the matter, if in its wisdom it sees proper to do so. We confine what we have to say to the statute of wills.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.