Hackin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2002 · most notably Hackin v. Arizona (1967), Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission (1980)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Berry · 87 Ohio Law. Abs. 418 - State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co. · State v. Locks · Application of Levine · State v. Curry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a practical realization that one confined to a cell, without ready access to a lawyer, often must depend on his family or friends to have “his body brought before the court” (i.e. “habeas corpus”) to determine the legality of his incarceration. Id. at 911.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Carroll“It cannot be disputed that one who represents another in court, be he an indigent or not, is, under our adversary process, going to the very core of the practice of law, a fact with which even the most uninformed persons are well aware.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Murray v. State“[n]o person shall practice law in this state unless he is an active member of the state bar in good standing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.