Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

102 Ariz. 31

Bowling v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1967

Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1967-02-28

Relies on Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance

Decided 1967-02-28

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petitioners having been convicted of the crime of Bribery and Conspiracy, under A.R.S. § 13-286 and § 13-331, in the Superior Court of Pima County, were sentenced by the same court. From this conviction and sentence petitioners appeal.

¶2The appeal being now in the Court of Appeals, Division Two, petitioners then filed this motion for retention of appeal in the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona. This court has concurrent jurisdiction in cases on appeal from the Superior Court. Arizona Podiatry Assn. et al. v. Director of Insur. of the State of Ariz. et al., 101 Ariz. 544, 422 P.2d 108.

¶3However, for the reasons stated in Arizona Podiatry Association et al. v. Director of Insurance, supra, the motion requesting the Court to take direct jurisdiction of the instant case is denied.

/102/ariz/31 · .json · Public domain