Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ariz. 377 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
3
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably 183 W. Va. 641 - State v. Edward Charles L. (1990), State v. Jalette (1978)

85 state decisions

580196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))

Relies on 31 Cal. 2d 555 - People v. Slobodion · State v. Berry · State v. Sorrell · State v. Daymus · State v. Quintana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The well-established principle of law to the effect that evidence of the commission by accused of other offenses entirely distinct and independent of that for which he is on trial is neither relevant nor admissible is the accepted rule in this jurisdiction. * * * Equally recognized in this state is the best known exception to this rule, to wit, that where the evidence of similar offenses tends to show a system, plan or scheme embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that the proof of one tends to establish the other, such evidence then becomes both relevant and admissible.” [Citations omitted]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is our opinion that this type of sex crime requires the sternest of measures. The damage to the emotional well-being of the two little girls coupled with the number of times these offenses were committed by the defendant requires the conclusion that the sentence imposed was a just one.” 102 Ariz. at 381 , 430 P.2d at 143 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The test of whether ór not one is an accomplice is whether he could be informed against for the same crime of which the defendant is accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.