State v. Enriquez’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 1997
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Singleton · State v. Maldonado · State v. Stago · Hash v. State of Arizona · State v. Loftis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant contends that he was. denied a speedy trial in violation of constitutional guarantees. The motion to dismiss the case on the grounds of a denial of a speedy trial was addressed only to the time elapsed between the defendant’s arrest and the time that he was bound over to the superior court for trial. ,We have stated, “The rule is firmly etablished [sic] that the protection afforded by Art. 2, § 24 of the Arizona Constitution and by the Sixth Amendment right under the United States Constitu tion to a speedy trial, has no application until after a prosecution is commenced or an accused is held to answer.” [Citations omitted] * * * [D]efendant was at liberty on bond during the interval be- . tween his arrest and the preliminary hearing, and there has been no showing that prejudice has resulted to the defendant from the delays.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.