Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ark. App. 210 - Mainard v. State

102 Ark. App. 210 - Mainard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grillot v. State · Lamb v. State · Wyles v. State · 100 Ark. App. 355 - Tomboli v. State · 98 Ark. App. 39 - Eaton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to preserve challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting convictions for lesser-included offenses, defendants must address the lesser-included offenses either by name or by apprising the trial court of the elements of the lesser-included offenses questioned by their motions for directed verdict. Appellant’s directed verdict motion did not include the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder, either in name or in elements; accordingly, we find that appellant’s argument is not preserved for appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.