¶1The court having denied a rehearing of this cause, I take the occasion to say that I have never concurred in the affirmance of that part of the decree of the superior court awarding alimony. The amount of alimony awarded is based upon a finding of fact directly opposed to the stipulation of the parties that the answer of defendant was true as to the value of his.property and business. In my opinion, the answer, on a fair construction of its language, makes a sharp issue upon this point.
102 Cal. 433
Wolff v. Wolff
Decided May 14, 1894
California Supreme Court · decided 1894-05-14
Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a 'new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-05-14
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1949
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →