102 Cal. App. 2d 338 - Bradner v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2000
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 13 Cal. 2d 158 - Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co. · 10 Cal. 2d 442 - Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co. · Oakland Paving Co. v. Hilton · Shoemaker v. Acker · Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is realized by me that my compensation in the near future will be rather small, but as more wells are developed, I will be more adequately compensated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.