Mackel v. Rochester’s Empirical Analysis
102 F. 314 · 1900
Citation profile
6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1924
6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Walker · Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Provided, that this section shall not exempt any party or witness, from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in discovering or testifs'-ing as aforesaid.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.