Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.2d 459 - The Mandu

The Mandu’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.2d 459 · 1939

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably Shaw, Savill, Albion & Co. v. The Fredericksburg (1951), Motor Distributors, Limited v. Olaf Pedersen's Rederi A/s Owner of the Sunny Prince (1957)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

13019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Belgenland · Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd. · Slater v. Mexican National Railroad · Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co. · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Babcock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In non-maritime causes a person who takes legal title to a claim by outright assignment is deemed the real party in interest and is entitled to maintain suit in his own name, and it makes no difference that he is merely collecting for the account of the assignor. Sheridan v. Mayor [etc., of City of New York], 68 N.Y. 30 ; Anderson v. Reardon, 46 Minn. 185 , 48 N.W. 777 ; King v. Miller, 53 Or. 53 , 97 P. 542 ; Chase v. Dodge, 111 Wis. 70 , 86 N.W. 548 . The practice in admiralty is the same * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““So for jurisdictional purposes the case may be treated as one where the adversaries were German shippers on the one side and a Brazilian ship owner on the other. On such a basis the foreigners interested were of different nationalities; they had no common home to which they might be sent to try their case; no agreement had been made that litigation be carried on in a particular country. Under these conditions it would have been unusual to have declined jurisdiction even at an early stage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. The Elqui
  3. ““It will not do to say that the articles of the Convention are against our public policy. While our own law lays down different rules, ‘we are not so provincial' as to say that every solution of a problem is wrong because we deal with it otherwise at home.’ Loucks v. Standard Oil Co., 224 N.Y. 99, 111 , 120 N.E. 198, 201 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.