Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.2d 622 - Cummings v. Hardee

Cummings v. Hardee’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.2d 622 · 1939

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 1977
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 1977 · most notably McGrath v. Zander (1949), National Ass'n of Regional Councils v. Costle (1977)

16 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

17019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 4301 · 50 U.S.C. § 4309 · 50 U.S.C. § 4312 · 50 U.S.C. § 4321 · 50 U.S.C. § 4327

Relies on Jefferson & Clearfield Coal & Iron Co. v. United States · Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und Discontogesellschaft · Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co. · Reeside v. Walker · Banco Mexicano De Commercio Industria v. Deutsche Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it should be observed that our former decision was based upon the facts appearing in the bill of complaint in that suit, and these facts showed that the fund being sued for — the proceeds of the pledge— was then a fund exclusively under the control of the Attorney General; that it was not money of the United States; was held by the Attorney General; and had not been covered into the Treasury of (the United States and commingled with the moneys of the United States. The contrary appears on the appeal in the present suit. We do not, therefore, regard O’Connor v. Rhodes, supra [ 65 App.D.C. 21 , 79 F.2d 146 ], as establishing the law in this case or, in view of the circumstances, as controlling.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.