Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.2d 78 - Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Marshall

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.2d 78 · 1939

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 913 · 33 U.S.C. § 933

Relies on Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad · Chapman v. Hoage · Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Kenney · Green v. Crowell · Bolin v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Time for filing of claims. (a) The right to compensation for disability under this chapter shall be barred unless a claim therefor is filed within one year after the injury, and the right to compensation for death shall be barred unless a claim therefor is filed within one year after the death, except that if payment of compensation has been made without an award on account of such injury or death a claim may be filed within one year after the date of the last payment. Such claim shall be filed with the deputy commissioner in the compensation district in which such injury or such death occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * appellant has not been . prejudiced by appellee’s failure to proceed against the third party, for since no right of action existed against the third party there could be no preju- ■ dice to the right of subrogation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.