In re Bostwick’s Empirical Analysis
102 F.2d 886 · 1939
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1987
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Wagenhorst · In re Guastavino · Fox Typewriter Co v. Corona Typewriter Co. · In re Murray · Bechtold v. Lanser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no right to a reissue of a patent may be predicated upon the failure of the Patent Office to declare an interference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Joseph W. Keil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.