Carruthers v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
102 F.2d 933 · 1939
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Poliafico v. United States (1956), Johnson v. Williams (1943)
50 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Strauder v. West Virginia · Frank v. Mangum · Moore v. Dempsey · Neal v. Delaware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where parties, even in a criminal case, knowingly and deliberately adopt a course of procedure which at the time appears to be to their best interest, they cannot be permitted at a later time, after a decision has been rendered adverse to them, to obtain a retrial according to procedure which they have voluntarily discarded and waived.” Carruthers v. Reed, 8 Cir., 102 F.2d 933, 938 , certiorari denied 1939, 307 U.S. 643 , 59 S.Ct. 1047 , 83 L.Ed. 1523 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the law of Arkansas a challenge to the panel or motion to quash must be promptly made and it is too late if the jury has been empanelled and sworn. Brown v. State, 12 Ark. 623 (See 35 C.J. 377). If no objection was made at the trial, it is too late to urge it for the first time after verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bailey v. State““Petitioners waived their right to review the judgment of the state court-‘in the regular manner, and ha beas corpus in the circumstances cannot be substituted for such review.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bailey v. Henslee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.