Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.3d 1012 - Marks v. Clarke

Marks v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.3d 1012 · 1996

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
5
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Alexandra White Joseph Deringer Richard Graham v. Russell Lee Lynn Tamiyasu-Lee Lavera Gillespie Paul Smith Robert Zurowski John Phillips Elizabeth Julian (2000), Mendocino Environmental Center v. Mendocino County (1999)

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

3201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · United States v. Leon · Malley v. Briggs · Whren v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ma[k]e inquiry as to the nature and scope of [the] warrant,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unquestionably inextricably intertwined with [the] decision[ ] to deny appellants qualified immunity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “held that a defendant may appeal both the district court's denial of a motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity and a subsequent denial of summary judgment on the basis of such immunity”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.