Amarel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The case law makes clear that where a district court has set reasonable time limits and has shown flexibility in applying them, that court does not abuse its discretion. Moreover, to overturn a jury verdict based on a party’s failure to use its limited time for witness cross-examination would be to invite parties to exhaust their time limits without completing cross-examination, then appeal on due process grounds.”); Deus v. Allstate Ins. Co., 15 F.3d 506, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1014 , 115 S.Ct. 573 , 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Raynor v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. · 246 F. Supp. 2d 343 - Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

2. “(1) the nature of plaintiffs’ alleged injury-whether it was the type the antitrust laws were intended to forestall; (2) the directness of the injury; (3) the speculative measure of the harm; (4) the risk of duplicative recovery; and (5) the complexity in apportioning damages.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Antoine L. Garabet, M.D., Inc. v. Autonomous Technologies Corp. · 484 F. Supp. 2d 1059 - In Re Tableware Antitrust Litigation

3. “involves a case-by-case analysis of `the plaintiffs harm, the alleged wrongdoing by the defendants, and the relationship between them.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rice v. Treasure Island Associates · 354 F. Supp. 2d 1113 - In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation