Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.3d 486 - Bennett v. United States

Bennett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.3d 486 · 1996

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1997), Zelaya v. United States (2015)

8 federal appellate ·

1101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2674

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc. · Williams v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An issue of fact is “genuine” if the record as a whole could lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). An issue is “material” if it might affect the outcome of the case under the governing law. Id.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.