United States v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
102 F.3d 641 · 1996
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Nelson-Rodriguez (2003), United States v. Heldeman (2005)
32 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ornelas v. United States · Nix v. Williams · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]ithdrawal is not a defense to a conspiracy charge if the conspiracy violation has already occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“nothing in the record show[ed] that [the agent] urged, suggested or was even aware of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to apply the pressure or inducement later deemed improper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.