Madden v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis
102 F.3d 74 · 1996
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 380 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably In re Diet Drugs Products Liability Litigation (2005), Kelly v. Ford Motor Co. (1997)
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 703
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc · Will v. United States · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 380 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“constitutes a procedural mechanism through which a court of appeals reviews a carefully circumscribed and discrete category of district court orders.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“appropriate disposition as a Section 2255 [Motion].” That motion remains pending. Although a writ of mandamus may issue when a district court’s "undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael Reynolds v.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.