Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.3d 753 - Yarnevic v. Brink's, Inc.

Yarnevic v. Brink's, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.3d 753 · 1996

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
7
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Hartsell v. Duplex Products, Inc. (1997), Diet Drugs (2002)

15 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions

2601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Willingham v. Morgan · Powers v. Chesapeake O Ry Co · Charbonnages De France v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f the case stated by the initial pleading is not removable, a notice of removal may be filed within 30 days after receipt by the defendant ... of a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained that the case is one which is or has become removable .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is broad enough to include any information received by the defendant, whether communicated in a formal or informal matter”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “' "immediately strips the state court of its jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.