Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F.3d 932 - Pittway Corporation v. United States

Pittway Corporation v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

102 F.3d 932 · 1996

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Kariotis v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. (1997), United States of America v. Balint (2000)

13 federal appellate ·

210199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4661 (§ 211 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Caminetti v. United States · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · First Chicago Corp. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'literal application of a statute will produce a result demonstrably at odds with the intentions of its drafters.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The plain meaning of legislation should be conclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.