Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Fla. 1127 - Bess v. Anderson

Bess v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 1967
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1967

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

601931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johns v. Bowden · Jackson v. Jackson · Norton v. Baya · Morgan v. Bailey · Griffith v. Griffith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Constitution (art. 10, § 1) provides that the homestead `real estate shall not be alienable without the joint consent of husband and wife, when that relation exists.' Where a husband and wife without consideration purport to convey the husband's homestead real estate to a third person as trustee, who as trustee on the same day and without consideration makes a purported conveyance of the same land to the same husband and wife, for the purpose of vesting an estate by the entireties in the homestead land in the husband and wife, such purported conveyances are not such an alienation of the homestead real estate as is permitted by the Constitution; and they are ineffectual to convey the homestead land or to create an estate by the entireties in the homestead real estate. See Jackson v. Jackson, 90 Fla. 563 , 107 So. 255 ; Norton v. Baya et al., 88 Fla. 1 , 102 So. 361 . * * *" (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.