Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 F. Supp. 3d 306 - Keepseagle v. Vilsack

102 F. Supp. 3d 306 - Keepseagle v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Landis v. North American Co. · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation · Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may be implicated when class counsel seeks to bargain away the right to enforce portions of a previously entered settlement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(i) “grants must be to a tax-exempt organization . described in Section 501(c)(8) of the Code; educational organization described in Section 170(b)(l)(A)(ii) of the Code; or an instrumentality of a state or federally recognized tribe, including a non-profit organization chartered under the tribal law of a state or federally recognized tribe, that furnishes assistance designed to further Native American farming or ranching activities”; and (ii) “the organization must use the funds to provide business assistance, agricultural education, technical support, and advocacy services to Native American farmers and ranchers, including those seeking to become farmers or ranchers, to support and promote their continued engagement in agriculture.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) they must have “provided business assistance, agricultural education, technical support, or advocacy services to Native American farmers or ranchers between 1981 and November 1, 2010 to support and promote their continued engagement in agriculture”; and (2) they must be “either a tax-exempt organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code ... educational organization described in Section 170(b)(l)(A)(ii) of the Code; or an instrumentality of a state or federally recognized tribe, including a non-profit organization chartered under the tribal law. of a state or federally recognized tribe, that furnishes assistance designed to further Native American farming or ranching activities.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.