Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 GA 387 - Bone v. State

Bone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Zwiren v. Thompson (2003), Rivers v. State (1982)

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

90189719001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miles v. United States · Harrison v. State · Giles v. State · Territory of Montana v. McAndrews · Burt v. Merchants' Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t would be logical, I think, that the facts of an alibi should come into the case like any other matters of defense, to be considered the same way, and affect the mind of the jury only as they believe the truth to be. Being a part of the evidence, these facts should be considered with the other evidence in the case, and, after due consideration of the evidence as a whole, the defendant should have the benefit of all reasonable doubt as to his guilt. However this may be, the law of this state is settled as above set out, and I follow as it is written.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “alibi must be established to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.