Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Idaho 306 - State v. Holtslander

State v. Holtslander’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Zurla v. State (1990), State v. Campbell (1983)

25 state decisions

12019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · United States v. Ewell · Dickey v. Florida · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It should be noted that each of the Barker factors involves primarily factual inquiries, so that the decision of the trial court granting a dismissal is entitled to great weight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.