State v. Bottelson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

cited by 46 later decisions

states following

December 2019

most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably State v. Johnson (1986), State v. Thompson (1988)

46 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois · Chambers v. Maroney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[O]nce the search is shown to have been made without a warrant, the search is deemed to be per se unreasonable, and the burden shifts to the state to show that the search was pursuant to one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Reimer · State v. Wolfe
“[a] court may not exclude evidence under the fourth amendment unless it finds that an unlawful search or seizure violated the defendant's legitimate expectation of privacy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Ryan · State v. Cowen
“In light of the renewed emphasis on Chambers in the recent cases of Texas v. White [ 423 U.S. 67 , 96 S.Ct. 304 , 46 L.Ed.2d 209 (1975) ], supra, Arkansas v. Sanders [ 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979) ], supra, and Colorado v. Bannister [ 449 U.S. 1 , 101 S.Ct. 42 , 66 L.Ed.2d 1 (1980)], supra, it appears that, in the situation presented here, either securing the automobile and then obtaining a warrant, or proceeding with a warrantless search would have been reasonable under the fourth amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Williams

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.