Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ill. App. 3d 270 - Spike v. Sellett

102 Ill. App. 3d 270 - Spike v. Sellett’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 72 Ill. 2d 249 - Walski v. Tiesenga · 60 Ill. 2d 418 - Borowski v. Von Solbrig · 14 Ill. App. 3d 672 - Borowski v. Von Solbrig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a doctor has given a plaintiff the benefit of his best judgment, assuming that judgment to be equal to that ordinarily used by reasonably well-qualified doctors in similar cases, he is ' not liable for negligence, even if that judgment is erroneous.” ( 102 Ill. App. 3d 270, 273 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]roof that a good result was not achieved is not proof of a breach of a physician's duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.