102 Ill. App. 3d 639 - People v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 103 Ill. 2d 111 - People v. Lewis (1984), 322 Ill. App. 3d 177 - People v. Contorno (2001)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 30 Ill. 2d 611 - The People v. McKinstray · 26 Ill. App. 3d 648 - People v. Lang · 15 Ill. App. 3d 680 - People v. Johnson · 65 Ill. App. 3d 580 - People v. Davis · 25 Ill. App. 3d 1007 - People v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““*** Dr. Bogen being a member of the Psychiatric Institute of the Circuit Court of Cook County, would testify that on May 31, 1979, he had occasion to examine the defendant before the Court, Jessie McKinley, and at that time making observations and after interviewing Mr. Jessie McKinley came to the opinion, and so stated it is his opinion that the defendant is mentally fit to stand trial and that he understands the nature of the charges pending against him, the purpose of the proceedings, and that he is able to cooperate with counsel in his own defense.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘MR. ROBBINS [prosecutor]: Your Honor, on behalf of the people of the State of Illinois, we would be willing to stipulate to the findings of the two psychiatrists as contained in the reports and to stipulate to the fact that the defendant is fit for trial. MR. LANGE [defense counsel]: Will you also stipulate to the qualifications of Dr. McCabe? MR. ROBBINS: Yes. We will stipulate that they are duly certified and qualified psychiatrists and that they have examined the defendant and we would stipulate to their finding that the defendant is fit to stand trial. MR. LANGE: We will stipulate to same matter, your Honor. THE COURT: Very well, fine. Where do we go from here, gentlemen?’ ” ( 102 Ill. App. 3d 639, 641 , 430 N.E.2d 219, 220-21 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.