102 Ill. App. 3d 651 - People v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 76 Ill. 2d 19 - People v. Baptist · 72 Ill. 2d 421 - People v. Murphy · 79 Ill. 2d 103 - People v. Greer · 44 Ill. 2d 244 - The People v. Nilsson · 66 Ill. 2d 478 - People v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““After carefully reviewing the record, we believe that the trial court erred in refusing the tendered instruction. The jury could have concluded from all the evidence before it, despite some inconsistencies in defendant’s testimony, that defendant killed Kim in the unreasonable belief that he was justified in doing so. Since the evidence was conflicting, it was for the jury, with the benefit of proper instructions, to decide whether the killing was murder or manslaughter or justified as self-defense. [Citation.] We, therefore, must reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.” 102 Ill. App. 3d 651, 661 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.