Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Ill. App. 3d 950 - People v. Payne

102 Ill. App. 3d 950 - People v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Blockburger v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Officer Munkvold, at the time of the arrest of Mr. Bailey and Mr. Payne, they were searched, were they not? [ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY]: Objection. THE COURT: Sustained. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Basis? [ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY]: In fact, I'll withdraw the objection. THE WITNESS: Yes, they were. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Was the apartment QPill’PnPnV [THE WITNESS]: Yes, it was. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Thank you. That’s all.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.