Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 IND 129 - Furnas v. Friday

Furnas v. Friday’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 1973
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1973

22 state decisions

701885189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bethell v. Bethell · Frenzel v. Miller · Booher v. Goldsborough · West v. Wright · Krewson v. Cloud

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where there is an honest purpose, and neither recklessness nor carelessness, there can be no fraud, for fraud involves moral turpitude, and where there is neither a dishonest purpose nor recklessness, there can be no moral wrong.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . If the complaint had shown that the defendant professed to be an expert, and that he induced the plaintiff to rely upon his superior judgment or skill, ... a very different case would have been presented.” (Emphasis ours).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.