Kinkel v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1975
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ervin v. Morris · Poole v. French · Harris v. Frank · Lockwood v. Meade Land & Cattle Co. · Manley v. Debentures "B" Liquidation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judgment which plaintiff owns against Dyson Jackson was a lien upon the equitable interests of Dyson Jackson in the real estate in question from the first day of the term at which it was rendered. It was of record when Chase purchased the land. All that remained for Kinkel to establish was, that when Dyson Jackson repurchased the land he took the title in the name of his wife and son in fraud of creditors.” (p. 280.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kinkel v. Chase
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.