Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 KAN 878 - Koehler v. Gray

Koehler v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1997

9 state decisions

20191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. Benson · Weaver v. First National Bank · Dayton v. Donart · Strawn v. Strawn · Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chisholm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There the survivor was the widow of the former owner, and the rule as stated was limited to the survivorship of the husband or wife. We think, however, upon the same reasoning it should be extended to any member of the family. The exemption is for the benefit of the family as a whole, and of each individual composing it, so long as the relation is not severed. (13 R. C. L. 545.) The circumstance that a daughter has arrived at majority should not, in our judgment, prevent her from being considered a part of her father’s family. . . . Nor is it necessary to that relation that there should be a legal duty to support her.” (p. 881.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Property occupied as the homestead of the owner and his family remains exempt from sale for the payment of his debts after the death of himself (intestate) and his wife, so long as an unmarried daughter of full age, who had lived with him as a part of his family, continues her residence thereon without interruption. Battey v. Barker, 62 Kan. 517 , 64 Pac. 79 , overruled.” (Syl. J[ 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.