Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 ME 47 - Whitmore v. Gilley

Whitmore v. Gilley’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
8
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 370 F. Supp. 247 - Burgess v. M/V Tamano (1973), Frost v. Lucey (1967)

2 district · 26 state decisions

901906191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank v. Tyson · Wheeler v. Bedford · Village of St. Johns v. McFarlan · Mayor of Manchester v. Smyth · Bowden v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Though by reason of her land being on this cove the plaintiff may have more need or occasion than other persons to make use of the public right to the unimpeded navigation of the cove, and her land may be more damaged by the violation of that right, the right itself is still public and not private. Her ownership of land on the cove gives her no greater nor different right to navigate it. Every other citizen has the same right in kind and degree. The plaintiff may have a greater interest than others in the right and a greater need of its enforcement, but that does not change the public right into a private right. Frost v. Wash. Co. R. R. Co., 96 Maine, 76. It may be that an individual actually obstructed by an unauthorized structure while in the actual exercise of the public right may maintain an action for damages resulting, as was held in Brown v. Watson , 47 Maine, 161; but that is a different case from this where the only complaint is of the unfavorable effect upon the enjoyment and value of the land.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.