Bond v. Markstrum’s Empirical Analysis
1894
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1986 · most notably Hollingsworth v. Hicks (1953), State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Lewis (1973)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Secor v. . Sturgis · Burlen v. Shannon · Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam-Packet Co. v. Sickles · Bendernagle v. Cocks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A former adjudication of the right of action, where the court had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties, is unquestionably a bar to an action for the same debt or claim, and is conclusive where the same subject-matter is sought to be again litigated, no matter how, between the same parties. In such case it is no answer to say there were questions which were not raised or litigated. It is enough if they might have been raised and litigated.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““The estoppel extends to all steps involved in the judgment as necessary steps, or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. It is allowable to reason back from a judgment to the basis upon which it stands, upon the obvious principle that where a conclusion is indisputable, and could have been drawn only from certain premises, the premises are equally indisputable with the conclusion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burgess v. Stribling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.