Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 N.C. App. 440 - Carter v. Carter

102 N.C. App. 440 - Carter v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McCarley v. McCarley · Howell v. Howell · Wood v. Wood · 98 N.C. App. 484 - Gillikin v. Pierce · 101 N.C. App. 298 - Lutz v. Lutz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e reject defendant’s argument that the [trial] court effectively set aside, briefly, the divorce decree itself and then immediately reinstated the divorce decree with a reservation of an equitable distribution claim. Assuming the defendant was correct in her argument, the reservation of the equitable distribution claim would be a legal nullity because plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his equitable distribution claim and defendant did not, during the time the divorce was arguably set aside, file an answer, counterclaim or separate action requesting distribution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If there is no counterclaim pending at the time the plaintiff desires to enter a voluntary dismissal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1) or if there is a counterclaim and that counterclaim is independent and does not arise out of the same transaction as the complaint, a party may voluntarily dismiss his suit without the opposing party's consent by filing a notice of dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[b]ecause the trial court did not set aside the divorce judgment itself, its terms and validity still abide. Likewise, the legal effects of the divorce judgment still obtain. Neither Rule 60(b)(6) nor any other provision of law authorizes a court to nullify or avoid one or more of the legal effects of a valid judgment while leaving the judgment itself intact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.