Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 NCAPP 551 - Thomas v. Barnhill

Thomas v. Barnhill’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McLean v. McLean · Truesdale v. University of North Carolina · Lowder v. All Star Mills · Ingram v. Johnson · 91 N.C. App. 355 - Smith v. Buckhram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and disability, including anatomical, neurological, physiological, and pathological considerations within the scope of chiropractic, as defined in G.S. 90-151; and (2) The physiological dynamics of contiguous spinal structures which can cause neurological disturbances, the chiropractic procedure preparatory to, and complementary to the correction thereof, by an adjustment of the articulations of the vertebral column and other articulations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “legislative history suggests ... the General Assembly intended “to allow chiropractors to testify as to the spinal column and the physical structures that support and/or complement it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.