Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 Nev. 27 - Odoms v. State

Odoms v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Williams (2009), Tanksley v. State (1997)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Ash · Hoffa v. United States · Koza v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a defendant is convicted of a principal crime with the use of a deadly weapon and is adjudged an habitual criminal, the sentencing court may either enhance the sentence for the primary offense pursuant to NRS 193.165 for the use of a deadly weapon, or, alternatively, the court may enhance the sentence under the habitual criminal statute. A district court may not enhance a primary offense under both NRS 193.165 and NRS 207.010.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Barrett v. State
  2. “who has previously been three times convicted, whether in this state or elsewhere, of any crime which under the laws of the situs of the crime or of this state would amount to a felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Tanksley v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.