Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 NJSUPER 38 - T. v. H.

T. v. H.’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1982

3 state decisions

20196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 26 N.J. Super. 90 - Boerger v. Boerger · Commonwealth ex rel. Bendrick v. White · Sigesmund v. Sigesmund · 48 N.J. Super. 349 - Wojnarowicz v. Wojnarowicz · Dansker v. Dansker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if * * * a Jew who marries a Gentile continues to live in a Jewish environment, the chances are that the family will remain Jewish. But, if the environment is non-Jewish, the prospects are exactly the reverse. The results of studies showed that the number of mixed marriages in the agrarian part of the country was larger than in the cities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. T. v. H.
  2. “Even in the absence of any particular issue as to whether the child should be raised in one religion or another, the courts in awarding custody have referred to the good religious standing or qualification of the custodian chosen ... or that in the home chosen the child would have superior facilities for church or religious training”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. T. v. H.
  3. “* * * The number of Jews leaving the Jewish Community after marriage to a non-Jew is higher than that of the non-Jews entering the Jewish Community after marriage to a Jew.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. T. v. H.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.