Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 N.M. 166 - Clovis National Bank v. Harmon

Clovis National Bank v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las Cruces (1996), Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1999)

83 state decisions

40019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaeffer v. Kelton · Farmington National Bank v. Basin Plastics, Inc. · Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of Ruidoso · STATE, BY & THROUGH DEPT. OF HYS. v. Helehan · Robison v. Katz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This mortgage secures the performance of the following obligations: * * * * * (b) Payment of all loans, advances, indebtedness, or liabilities, whether now existing or which hereafter come into existence, whether matured or unmatured, whether direct or indirect, whether obligatory or discretionary, absolute or contingent, primary or secondary, including any extensions and renewals thereof, due mortgagee from mortgagor regardless of how acquired by mortgagee, not to exceed at any one time the maximum sum of $24,000.00, the advancement of which sum is discretionary but not obligatory upon mortgagee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we resolve all disputed facts in favor of the successful party, indulge all reasonable inferences in support of a verdict, and disregard all evidence and inferences to the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.