Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 N.M. 254 - State v. Herrera

State v. Herrera’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably State v. Gutierrez (1993), State v. Alvarez-Lopez (2004)

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Massachusetts v. Sheppard · State v. Williams · State v. Simonson · State v. Worley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here were insufficient facts to show probable cause to search the premises described for evidence of [the] murder; therefore, the search was illegal under both state and federal guarantees against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not do away with the basic requirement that the residence to be searched must be established to be that of the suspect, or alternatively, that the items sought to be seized are located at that residence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the existence of probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed murder is ordinarily sufficient to justify a search of the suspect's home, the surrounding area, and his business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.