Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 N.M. 512 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2013

24 state decisions

801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Iannelli v. United States · State v. Vogenthaler · State v. Turner · State v. Sandoval

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when the parties to the agreement are the only persons who participate in the offense and the immediate consequences of the crime rest only on themselves; and (2) when the agreement that attends the substantive offense does not appear likely to pose the sort of threat to society that the law of conspiracy was designed to avert.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.