State Ex Rel. Bardacke v. Welsh’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Doering v. Fader (1989), Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department (1995)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Will · United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co. · General Atomic Co. v. Felter · Gerety v. Demers · Heckathorn v. Heckathorn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“less restrictive method of regulating access is not required when the facts show a pattern of conduct which is either vexatious, oppressive or for the purpose of harassment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Zorn v. Smith“Welsh was simply taking too much of his time, forcing him to read cases that not only were meritless but `scandalous,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to secure to litigants a fair and impartial trial by an impartial and unbiased tribunal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.