Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 N.M. 723 - Cunningham v. Gross

Cunningham v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Blauwkamp v. University of New Mexico Hospital (1992), Wilcox v. Timberon Protective Association (1990)

40 state decisions

2201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. Goffe · C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens Bank · Montoya v. Barreras · Hoover v. Waggoman · State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. First Judicial District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he character of the interest to be protected, (2) the relative adequacy to the plaintiff of injunction in comparison with other remedies, (3) the delay, if any, in bringing suit, (4) the misconduct of the plaintiff if any, (5) the interest of third persons, (6) the practicability of granting and enforcing the order or judgment, and (7) the relative hardship likely to result to the defendant if an injunction is granted and to the plaintiff if it is denied.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “constitute valuable property rights of all lot owners”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.