Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 NW2D 1 - Temme v. Traxel

Temme v. Traxel’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1984

17 state decisions

100196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. * * *” Rule 56(c), N.D.R.Civ.P.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In cases involving issues of negligence, contributory negligence, assumption of risk and proximate cause, where the standard of the reasonable man must be applied to conflicting testimony, and even where there is no dispute as to the facts, where inferences may be reasonably drawn from the evidence that indicate the presence of a genuine issue of fact, summary judgment should not be granted, but these issues should be tried in the usual manner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “He who moves for summary judgment under Rule 56, North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, has the burden of establishing clearly that there is no genuine issue of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.