Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 102 NW2D 538 - Cose v. Towner County

Cose v. Towner County’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1997

8 state decisions

401960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCullagh v. Fortune · Rettler v. Ebreck · Olson v. Kem Temple Ancient Arabic Order of the Mystic Shrine · Schaller v. Bjornstad · Doll v. Treiber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record in this case is such that we can conceive of no reasonable explanation of the collision between decedent’s car and the county patrol from which negligence of the decedent as a substantial contributing factor can be eliminated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undisputed evidence establishes that decedent had sufficient time and distance within which to avoid the accident . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.